https://www.academia.edu/13200273/Statutory_Limitation

isaactumusiime@hotmail.com
 Page
 17
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Constitution of The Republic of Uganda, 1995 (as amended)The Civil Procedure rulesThe Limitation Act, Cap. 80 Laws of UgandaThe Civil Procedure and Limitation (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, Chapter 72 Lawsof Uganda
Text Books (arlsburys Laws of E
ngland 3rd Ed Vol. 24Musa Ssekaana & S. N. Ssekaana; Civil Procedure and Practice in Uganda, LawAfricaWalter Blake Odgers; Odgers on Pleading and Practice. Ninth edition, Stevens &Sons, Ltd. 1926Oxford Dictionary of Law 7th Ed; Oxford University Press, Page 328,ISBN9780199551248Musa Ssekaana & S. N. Ssekaana; Civil Procedure and Practice in Uganda, LawAfrica: Page 69 ISBN 4200006200 .Lord Greene MR in Hilton vs. Steam Laundry (1946) 1 KB 61 at page 81Eridad Otabong vs. Attorney General, S.C. C.A. 6/1990, (1991) ULSLR 150 SayikwoMurome vs. Yovani [1985] HCB 68, Odoki J, as he then was Order 7 Rule 11 (d)of theCivil Procedure Rules In Uganda, the Law governing the subject matter is theLimitation Act, Cap. 80 Laws of Uganda, and The Civil Procedure and Limitation(Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, Chapter 72 Laws of Uganda [1972] 1 EALR 63 Thespirit behind Article 126 (e) of the Uganda Constitution, 1995 as amended UgandaRevenue Authority Vs. Uganda Consolidated Properties (1997
 2001) UCL149(Justice Twinomujuni ,JA)
Blacks Law Dictionarys th Edition p.  [Emphasis mine] (. J.
Stanley & Sons Ltd Vs Said Narrow Zakor (1963) E.A. 565. Where a plaintiff wishes torely on any exemption to the periods of limitation it must be specifically stated inthe pleadings. If it is not the plaint should be rejected as held in Iga Vs MakerereUniversity (1972) EA 65. Section 21, Limitation Act and section 5, Civil Procedure andLimitation (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act
isaactumusiime@hotmail.com
 Page
 18
Eridad, Otabong Waimo vs Attorney General SCCA No. 6 of 1990David Oruk & Others vs Attorney General HCCS No. 2 of 1996 K.Patel v/s Uganda Revenue Authority HCC-00-CC-CS-0014-2003National Pharmacy Ltd v/s K.C.C [1979] HCB 246, and Sour Fap Farmous,RZ “ProMet” Belgrade Fransuska 61-65, & Anor v/s Attoney General [1997 -2001] UCL 396(HCT-00-CC-CS-0790-2003) [2006] UGCommC 62 [accessed viahttp://www.ulii.org/ug/judgment/commercial-court/2006/62] J.K.Patel v Uganda Revenue Authority – HCT-00-CC-CS-0014-2003 (YorokamuBamwine, J)
(alsburys Laws of England, rd Edn; para 9 at p.
Waimiha Saw Milling Co. Ltd v. Waione Timber Co. Ltd. [1926] A.C 101, Lord Buckmaster, at page 106B EA Timber Co Vs Inder Sigh Gill (1979) EA 463, Forbes, VP at page 469 and Order 6rule 3 of the Civil Procedure RulesMakula International Ltd vs His Eminence Cardinal Nsubuga and Anor [1982]HCB 11,Court of Appeal of Uganda Suleman Vs Azzan (1958) EA 553Philips Highs Vs Harper (1954) QB 411 Pearson J at page 119
Andrew McGees Limitation Periods nd Ed pages  –
 338Hermezdas Mulindwa and Another v Stanbic Bank (u) Ltd (HCT-00-CC-CS-0426-2004)
Lameck N. Mukasa, J (arlsburys Laws of England rd Ed Vo
l. 24 para 631 page 318Quoting Collins, M. R in Re Coles and Ravenshear [1907] 1 KB 1 at page 4
STATUTES
 THE CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA 1995THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULESTHE CIVIL PROCEDURE AND LIMITATION (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act cap 72
isaactumusiime@hotmail.com
 Page
 19
THE LIMITATION ACT CAP 80
TEXTS
 CIVIL PROCEDURE AND PRACTCE IN UGANDA, MUSA SSEKAANA
O(ARE AND ()LL C)V)L L)T)GAT)ON, BY JO(N O(ARE AND KEV)N BROWN)E
 
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a website or blog at WordPress.com

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: